From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,be23df8e7e275d73 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-09 01:55:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsxfer.eecs.umich.edu!news.cc.utah.edu!newsfeed.cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!not-for-mail From: "Bobby D. Bryant" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: "is ada dead?" A challenge for all of us? Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 02:44:08 +0600 Organization: The University of Texas at Austin; Austin, Texas Message-ID: <9ibr0l$m34$1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-7-12.ots.utexas.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu 994668373 22628 128.83.204.108 (9 Jul 2001 08:46:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cc.utexas.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: 9 Jul 2001 08:46:13 GMT User-Agent: Pan/0.9.7 (Unix) X-No-Productlinks: Yes Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9660 Date: 2001-07-09T08:46:13+00:00 List-Id: In article , "Michael Erdmann" wrote: > If you look as the open source market which is mainly driven by the > commonly available operating system (e.g Linux) you will find that C, > C++ and a lot of other lagnuages are mutch more dominant then Ada. > Typical for this situation is e.g. the fact that most of the Linux > distributions claim to support Ada, but the compiler is in fact NOT > part of the distribution. FWIW, recent versions of Red Hat Linux include both GNAT and GtkAda on the Powertools disk. Bobby Bryant Austin, Texas