From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a00006d3c4735d70
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-02-26 01:45:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!adsl-213-200-246-247.cybernet.CH!not-for-mail
From: Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler <nntp-2004-02@t-domaingrabbing.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: In-Out Parameters for functions
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:44:21 +0100
Organization: JeLlyFish software
Message-ID: <9ger30psabs517nuigjnpt73q08to2h9ts@jellix.jlfencey.com>
References: <pan.2004.02.24.23.23.33.578111@email.ro>
 <mailman.20.1077669870.327.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <pan.2004.02.25.09.01.17.858502@email.ro>
 <1077718871.47635@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <54cp3095jmv8s17h63d4bjdus0tec7l7pt@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <1077721343.481619@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <ljgp301lgj3r0totpo3hlkmt3dbnbe0i33@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <1077724400.221032@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <lqhp30lbl0o3fu7nk9mj88satb6mmg8u8s@jellix.jlfencey.com>
 <1077727496.631820@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: adsl-213-200-246-247.cybernet.ch (213.200.246.247)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 1077788701 53213494 I 213.200.246.247 ([175126])
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:5832
Date: 2004-02-26T10:44:21+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hyman Rosen wrote:

>Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler wrote:
>> Hyman Rosen wrote:
>>>The rules of Ada require that for "and", both
>>>operands are evaluated!
>> No, it doesn't.
>
>ARM 4.5/11 says
>     "The two operands of an expression of the form X op Y,
>      where op is a binary operator, are evaluated in an
>      arbitrary order, as for any function_call (see 6.4)."
>
>Where do you find permission for Ada to not evaluate one
>operand of an "and" or "or" expression?

In "arbitrary"? ;-)


Vinzent.