From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6b1ee86289c4a75e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-11 16:08:13 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: private properties of tagged records Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: <9g3j0r$2n9$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> References: <9frakn$5qr8r$1@ID-42131.news.dfncis.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 992300891 2793 134.91.4.34 (11 Jun 2001 23:08:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:08:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8586 Date: 2001-06-11T23:08:11+00:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: : : Right. If you want both, you can do something like this: : ... : type T_Visible is abstract new ... with : record : ... -- visible stuff : end record; : type T is new T_Visible with private; ... Is this also an opportunity to think about record discriminants, and limited records? Just curious. --Georg --- Microsoft Windows--a fresh perspective on information hiding