From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,XPRIO autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6b1ee86289c4a75e,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-08 12:56:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!skynet.be!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!cmn2-3e36facd.pool.mediaways.NET!not-for-mail From: "Thomas Nebel" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: private properties of tagged records Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:56:06 +0200 Message-ID: <9frakn$5qr8r$1@ID-42131.news.dfncis.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: cmn2-3e36facd.pool.mediaways.net (62.54.250.205) X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 992030167 6122779 62.54.250.205 (16 [42131]) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8451 Date: 2001-06-08T21:56:06+02:00 List-Id: Hi Is there a possibility to make properties of a tagged record "private"?; that you can access these properties only from a view functions, that have the exclusive "right" to access them? Otherwise every function could change values in evrey record... Thomas