From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,36b3b08d6dced184 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: byhoe@greenlime.com (Adrian Hoe) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Solaris 9 and florist Date: 26 Jun 2004 19:21:24 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <9ff447f2.0406261821.7f2849ff@posting.google.com> References: <9ff447f2.0406230444.49f5d774@posting.google.com> <71vcbc.441.ln@leia> <9ff447f2.0406240229.72fa3f97@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 219.95.192.127 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1088302884 10599 127.0.0.1 (27 Jun 2004 02:21:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 02:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1941 Date: 2004-06-26T19:21:24-07:00 List-Id: Frode Tenneb� wrote in message news:... > gnat 3.13p uses gcc 2.8.1 - you haven't mixed anything up with libraries > or other dependencies? I used 2.95.3 and I believe I had a clean installation. > > I tried with gcc-3.3.2, the same error happens. > > > > What could possible be wrong here? > > > > Should I switch back to Solaris 8? > > You are using tasks and the tasking in gnat (at least for 3.13p) uses a > undocumented method for accessing some thread information in Solaris. > This broke for Solaris 9. > > I did a Makefile 'hack' when compiling GNAT which replaces one file in > the task implementation and this has worked for me. However, the > details of this fix escapes me, but I have it at work. However, I just > went on vacation for two weeks. I can look it up for you if that's soon > enough. Do I have to compile gnat again? I would love to have that when you come back from vacation. Does anybody know if Solaris 10 have no such problem as S9? Thanks. -- Adrian Hoe m a i l b o x _AT_ a d r i a n * c o m