From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f74fc2d2cb13dd35,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-07 17:18:23 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: byhoe@greenlime.com (Adrian Hoe) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: SGI Ada95 compiler Date: 7 Mar 2002 17:18:22 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <9ff447f2.0203071718.da81223@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 210.186.172.121 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1015550303 8840 127.0.0.1 (8 Mar 2002 01:18:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Mar 2002 01:18:23 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20921 Date: 2002-03-08T01:18:23+00:00 List-Id: Hi, I have searched the Google's archives and found lots of threads talking about SGI Ada95. I am planning a project at this moment and I am thinking of getting SGI workstation. And of course, I am going to use Ada for my project. My understanding from those threads is that SGI has been investing a lot into Ada95 compiler and they even make their Ada to interoperate well with their C/C++ libraries. And I also know that Ada can inherit classes from C++ and vice versa. And I also learned that SGI Ada95 is a port of GNAT (or actually GNAT). Can somebody confirm this? Is code written for SGI Ada95 compilable using other Ada compilers especially the C++/Ada inheritance things have been added by SGI? Is there anyone using SGI Ada95 (I bet a handful of them)? Can you share your experience using SGI Ada95? Is there any comparison charts (sort of) for SGI Ada95 and other Ada95 compilers? Where can I get more information about SGI Ada95? I have visited SGI's Ada95 website and the information is limited there. Thanks. -- Adrian Hoe -- http://adrianhoe.com