From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-14 18:32:50 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: softeng3456@netscape.net (soft-eng)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Using Ada for device drivers?
Date: 14 May 2003 18:32:49 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <9fa75d42.0305141732.74d34877@posting.google.com>
References: <9fa75d42.0304230424.10612b1a@posting.google.com>
 <C73FB1279386F1CD.BF0175B06B325A3F.212017A5819C3CBB@lp.airnews.net>
 <9fa75d42.0305010621.55e99deb@posting.google.com>
 <b8toba$79o$1@slb0.atl.mindspring.net>
 <9fa75d42.0305090937.2bbe1238@posting.google.com>
 <5s29SIA1KKv+EwcU@nildram.co.uk>
 <9fa75d42.0305100927.422ffb88@posting.google.com>
 <3EBECAF3.4010509@attbi.com>
 <9fa75d42.0305120551.75f61cbb@posting.google.com>
 <b9qnfq$him$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.243.127.233
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1052962369 18814 127.0.0.1 (15 May 2003 01:32:49
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 May 2003 01:32:49 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:63817 comp.object:63409
 comp.lang.ada:37337
Date: 2003-05-15T01:32:49+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@d2-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> wrote in message news:<b9qnfq$him$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>...
> In comp.lang.ada soft-eng <softeng3456@netscape.net> wrote:
>  
> : I thought banks merged due to economic issues -- if any
> : single merger was related to Y2K, it sure wasn't publicized.
> 
> What else than a technically caused economic issue shoud Y2K be?

You think the economy tanked due to Y2K?