From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 11232c,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public
X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-30 05:12:11 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: softeng3456@netscape.net (soft-eng)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada,misc.misc
Subject: Re: the Ada mandate,
 and why it collapsed and died (was): 64 bit    addressing and OOP
Date: 30 Apr 2003 05:12:11 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <9fa75d42.0304300412.3c9f8157@posting.google.com>
References: <mvul4v00ftbai2g6duuh0r38jpii2qvpjl@4ax.com>
 <9fa75d42.0304221126.7112b7d5@posting.google.com>
 <b84gku$2i5l$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <9fa75d42.0304230439.55d28e70@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbadndp.o8q.mbkennelSPAMBEGONE@lyapunov.ucsd.edu>
 <9fa75d42.0304240503.54dbc5d1@posting.google.com>
 <WLKGbLATlNq+EwiQ@nildram.co.uk>
 <9fa75d42.0304250437.38893d8c@posting.google.com>
 <3EA9E194.BAC2A2B6@adaworks.com>
 <9fa75d42.0304260659.6d02cb59@posting.google.com>
 <3EAF3464.9E06145F@adaworks.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.97.239.23
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1051704731 31007 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2003 12:12:11
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 30 Apr 2003 12:12:11 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:62924 comp.object:62339
 comp.lang.ada:36760 misc.misc:13814
Date: 2003-04-30T12:12:11+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Richard Riehle <richard@adaworks.com> wrote in message news:<3EAF3464.9E06145F@adaworks.com>...
> 
> Sorry you had such bad Ada training.   There was a lot of that
> going around at one time, perpetrated by people who simply
> failed to understand some elementary ideas and made them
> more complicated than necessary.

Do you really think my views on Ada are a result of
bad training?

I suppose that is a very fair representation of the
analysis and insight capabilities of those who
choose to espouse the cause you are championing here...