From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FREEMAIL_REPLY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 11232c,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-25 05:48:20 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: softeng3456@netscape.net (soft-eng) Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada,misc.misc Subject: Re: the Ada mandate, and why it collapsed and died (was): 64 bit addressing and OOP Date: 25 Apr 2003 05:48:19 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <9fa75d42.0304250448.5107afef@posting.google.com> References: <8qkczsAcGcn+Ew83@nildram.co.uk> <3EA04A1E.CAFC1FEF@adaworks.com> <9fa75d42.0304221126.7112b7d5@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0304230439.55d28e70@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0304240503.54dbc5d1@posting.google.com> <20619edc.0304240953.221ac70f@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 32.97.239.26 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1051274899 15745 127.0.0.1 (25 Apr 2003 12:48:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Apr 2003 12:48:19 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:62655 comp.object:61946 comp.lang.ada:36533 misc.misc:13678 Date: 2003-04-25T12:48:19+00:00 List-Id: snarflemike@yahoo.com (Mike Silva) wrote in message news:<20619edc.0304240953.221ac70f@posting.google.com>... > softeng3456@netscape.net (soft-eng) wrote in message news:<9fa75d42.0304240503.54dbc5d1@posting.google.com>... > > > > If Ada projects had actually succeeded in producing good quality > > software, it would have been everywhere today. > > Yeah, I see your point. Kind of like why nobody runs Windows anymore. > > Mike Works for me (plus several million other people.) I even used Unix for years, even when it DIDN't work 1/10th as reliably as today's Windows. It's good to see operating systems progress to the point where anybody off the streets can realiably use them and the only people complaing about the reliability are ones with axes to grind.