From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930
X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,25d5234e7b6ca361
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 11232c,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-02 15:38:39 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: softeng3456@netscape.net (soft-eng)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada,misc.misc
Subject: Re: Ada versus language-X and "getting real work done" (was): 64 bit
 addressing and OOP
Date: 2 Mar 2003 15:38:38 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <9fa75d42.0303021538.7e7cb00e@posting.google.com>
References: <mvul4v00ftbai2g6duuh0r38jpii2qvpjl@4ax.com>
 <3E4E8F8C.9C096985@adaworks.com>
 <9fa75d42.0302250710.5549baaf@posting.google.com>
 <3E5C7033.BD5DC462@adaworks.com>
 <9fa75d42.0302260618.7506cba7@posting.google.com>
 <3E5CF5C6.84822F57@adaworks.com>
 <a3eaa964.0302261422.4d166fa1@posting.google.com>
 <9fa75d42.0302270726.665fee77@posting.google.com>
 <a3eaa964.0302271552.46079d1a@posting.google.com>
 <9fa75d42.0302280615.3f6640c3@posting.google.com>
 <pIT7a.112509$F63.2422365@news.xtra.co.nz>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.243.80.190
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1046648319 16603 127.0.0.1 (2 Mar 2003 23:38:39
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Mar 2003 23:38:39 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:59527 comp.object:58767
 comp.lang.ada:34811 misc.misc:12277
Date: 2003-03-02T23:38:39+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"AG" <ang@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message news:<pIT7a.112509$F63.2422365@news.xtra.co.nz>...
> "soft-eng" <softeng3456@netscape.net> wrote in message

> Any half (or quater)-way decent spell
> checker (not to mention a compiler
> which is supposed to know better)
> should have shot that post down
> at first sight. Before some "seargent"
> went loose with it  :)
> 
> [Note that I may make spelling
> mistakes too - it's just that I don't
> claim that I'm always right. Some

Thanks for illustrating that point
in this very post with your spelling
of "quater" :-)

Btw, did you find a claim from me somewhere
that I'm always right?  (I do, however,
claim to normally honor the netiquette of
ignoring minor spelling mistakes.)