From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9fbc059a74d74032 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-31 11:26:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!skynet.be!isdnet!psinet-france!psiuk-f4!psiuk-p4!uknet!psiuk-n!news.pace.co.uk!nh.pace.co.uk!not-for-mail From: "Marin David Condic" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Leap Seconds Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 14:12:15 -0400 Organization: Posted on a server owned by Pace Micro Technology plc Message-ID: <9f61i3$mkb$1@nh.pace.co.uk> References: <9elpii$30i$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B0ED67B.E40A4E06@averstar.com> <9f0ciq$itb$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9f2ue6$hcm$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B1672F7.2298EF6@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 136.170.200.133 X-Trace: nh.pace.co.uk 991332739 23179 136.170.200.133 (31 May 2001 18:12:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@pace.co.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 May 2001 18:12:19 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7945 Date: 2001-05-31T18:12:19+00:00 List-Id: Well, if one wishes to be a stickler for accuracy, I suppose yours is a better interpretation of the law. But there is a Murphy's Law derivative that states that all engineering values will invariably be expressed in the least usable units. Thus, we *really* need to express this number in Furlongs per Fortnight. (and start *that* whole discussion all over again... :-) MDC -- Marin David Condic Senior Software Engineer Pace Micro Technology Americas www.pacemicro.com Enabling the digital revolution e-Mail: marin.condic@pacemicro.com Web: http://www.mcondic.com/ "Wes Groleau" wrote in message news:3B1672F7.2298EF6@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com... > > > problem. Much relative navigation depends on very accurate timekeeping and > > the speed of light. (186000 miles/second - it's not just a good idea, its > > In that case, let's make it 186,324.xx or somthing like that. > > -- > Wes Groleau > http://freepages.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau