From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 115914,8b985862f09ebe4a X-Google-Attributes: gid115914,public X-Google-Thread: f849b,8b985862f09ebe4a X-Google-Attributes: gidf849b,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,8b985862f09ebe4a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f8fcc,8b985862f09ebe4a X-Google-Attributes: gidf8fcc,public X-Google-Thread: f85cc,8b985862f09ebe4a X-Google-Attributes: gidf85cc,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,8b985862f09ebe4a X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,8b985862f09ebe4a X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-Thread: 107079,8b985862f09ebe4a X-Google-Attributes: gid107079,public From: John Larkin Subject: Re: blacklist Date: 2000/08/20 Message-ID: <9eqfObiU5rRzcjCKCyu9aOG+wXNx@4ax.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 660379960 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8no8ng$jjn$0@pita.alt.net> Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.arch.arithmetic,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.c++,comp.arch.embedded,comp.lang.ada,sci.math.num-analysis,comp.dsp,rec.scuba.equipment,alt.tv.days-of-our-lives X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Date: 2000-08-20T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 20 Aug 2000 03:35:58 -0600, "E. Robert Tisdale" wrote: >I have been considering maintaining and publishing >a blacklist data base for this newsgroup. >The blacklist data base would contain the names >of subscribers who post off-topic articles >to the newsgroup. >New subscribers and infrequent contributors >to the newsgroup would be advised >to consult the blacklist data base before responding >to articles posted in the newsgroup. >There would be, of course, no penalty imposed >upon subscribers who respond off-topic articles >except the penalty imposed by the blacklistee. >That is to say, the blacklist would be self enforcing. E, This suggestion is off-topic. John