From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,95eaa0c908f1c040
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@NOclasswideSPAM.com>
Subject: Re: the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid
Date: 1998/11/25
Message-ID: <9eV62.403$Wj.3147@SnBeta>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 415580141
References: <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
X-Trace: SnBeta 912007173 198.64.222.59 (Wed, 25 Nov 1998 07:19:33 PDT)
Organization: Software Arts & Sciences
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 07:19:33 PDT
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-11-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

partha sarathi panda wrote in message
<01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>...
>can anyone convince me on why the Ada object-oriented model does
even
>compare with  the tight c++ one?


Why is a person from Rational asking this question?