From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,49b52b8065390e5a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Martin <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Plattform Independence
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <9e83b410-71a3-4993-bdbc-24267897d488@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
References: <82d07df7-bee1-4fd4-b0e1-dd10f43f9f60@q1g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.151.68.6
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1236792829 31527 127.0.0.1 (11 Mar 2009 17:33:49
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:33:49 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.151.68.6;
	posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
	rv:1.9.0.7) Gecko/2009021906 Firefox/3.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4042
Date: 2009-03-11T10:33:49-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mar 11, 2:04=A0pm, "patrick.gu...@googlemail.com"
<patrick.gu...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I=B4m currently working on an analysis of an Ada-System with focus on
> the current state of plattform-independence. As my experiences wirh
> porting Ada-software to different operating system is limited and
> close to zero, I=B4d like to ask, which conecpts of the langiage might
> cause problems. I don=B4t mean aspects like including plattform-
> dependent libraries or calling system-functions from Ada-Code. I know
> that this will lead to portation problems. I=B4m more interested in
> problems with the Ada language itself. For example use of
> represantation clauses or I/O statements. I=B4ve been searching a while
> to find a listing of parts of the Ada standard which might cause
> problems, but didn=B4t succeed. So I hope, that you can help.
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick


Hi Patrick,

I've ported Ada code from 68k to i386 from no-OS to VxWorks to Win32
and in each case the biggest hurdle has been 'how good is the original
code'.

Assumptions on the sizes and ranges, esp. of the prefined types (esp.
Integer), can cause problems.

Fixed-point numbers are different between revisions of the language
(e.g. Ada83 v Ada95 v Ada2005) but should be portable enough between
different ports using the same language. Providing your not dependent
on a particular underlying representation being used.

The 'favourite' gotcha is usually using non-standard additions to
standard packages. E.g. XD-Ada extended the contents of package
'System' to include 8/16/32-bit signed/unsigned integer. Easy to deal
with - just define a package called 'XDAda_System' and defines
subtypes of the types in Interfaces in it. Then do a globel find/
replace for all occurences of 'with System' (and 'use'!) and you're
90% there.

I ported 45kSLOC from no-OS XD-Ada to GNAT GPL 2008 Wintel in an hour
the other week**.

Cheers
-- Martin

** Where 'ported' means getting a clean compilation / link and not
actually running it!