From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60fe876e7675f11
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Received: by 10.68.74.201 with SMTP id w9mr12451383pbv.0.1328716717163;
        Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:58:37 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 wr5ni1691pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Weird behavior with modular type
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 07:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <9de383d1-b855-42f5-b112-cd4e7250e326@q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
References: <op.v9bjzvhzule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <jgro6r$m6n$1@adenine.netfront.net>
 <32c99412-2c88-4438-a955-de19a7f034a2@d15g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>
 <op.v9bmlfrvule2fv@douda-yannick> <jgt65l$tvv$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1328716717 9059 127.0.0.1 (8 Feb 2012 15:58:37
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:58:37 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q12g2000yqg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122;
 posting-account=duW0ogkAAABjRdnxgLGXDfna0Gc6XqmQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: ARLUEHNKC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64;
 Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR
 3.5.21022; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618; .NET4.0C),gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-02-08T07:29:29-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 7, 10:53=A0pm, "J-P. Rosen" <ro...@adalog.fr> wrote:
> Le 07/02/2012 19:21, Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57) a =E9crit :
>
> > I still can't explain the first and the second interpretation. In the
> > first case =9310 ** I=94 seems to be interpreted as =93(10 ** I) mod 25=
6=94 and
> > =93Natural'Pos (10 ** I)=94 seems not.
>
> /operations/ of modular type wrap, and only operations. In the first
> case, there is an operation (**). In the second case, there is none (the
> ** is on Universal_Integer, which is not a modular type).
>
> Static expressions have to belong statically to their type, so it seems
> correct to me.

Except that there's no static expression here.

                          -- Adam