From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9ea66d3dcd0bfcf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-08 14:26:51 PST Path: newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!isdnet!psinet-france!psiuk-f4!psiuk-p4!uknet!psiuk-n!news.pace.co.uk!nh.pace.co.uk!not-for-mail From: "Marin David Condic" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Microsoft Follies (was: [ANNOUNCE] XML/Ada 0.5 released) Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 17:16:33 -0400 Organization: Posted on a server owned by Pace Micro Technology plc Message-ID: <9d9nni$9sb$1@nh.pace.co.uk> References: <9d6dmc$24v$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9d6i89$3nf$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9d6pnr$6a6$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3AF854C4.406F464C@gsde.hou.us.ray.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 136.170.200.133 X-Trace: nh.pace.co.uk 989356594 10123 136.170.200.133 (8 May 2001 21:16:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@pace.co.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 May 2001 21:16:34 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Xref: newsfeed.google.com comp.lang.ada:7342 Date: 2001-05-08T21:16:34+00:00 List-Id: Would you call this study "Software Archeology" or "Software Anthropology"? I'm wondering if we'd discover evidence proving the existence of Piltdown Man... :-) MDC -- Marin David Condic Senior Software Engineer Pace Micro Technology Americas www.pacemicro.com Enabling the digital revolution e-Mail: marin.condic@pacemicro.com Web: http://www.mcondic.com/ "Samuel T. Harris" wrote in message news:3AF854C4.406F464C@gsde.hou.us.ray.com... > > Once thing which continues to amuse me is that when I > look at the Windows API stuff, I can identify different > "epochs" of API creation. Naming schemes, the order of > parameters, the style of the documentation all show a > partitioning of the calls into little stylistically > consistent groups. >