From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5f6322415d6639e0
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!s38g2000prg.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Vadim Godunko <vgodunko@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Will the defect with formal package parameters be fixed in GNAT
	GPL 2009?
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:05:50 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <9d86256d-a0f3-4c43-82f9-98bb4641be69@s38g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
References: <558b7171-809b-4259-8679-4b4cff9de519@b6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 93.178.64.162
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1240844751 19990 127.0.0.1 (27 Apr 2009 15:05:51
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:05:51 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: s38g2000prg.googlegroups.com; posting-host=93.178.64.162;
	posting-account=niG3UgoAAAD7iQ3takWjEn_gw6D9X3ww
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.8)
	Gecko/2009032600 SUSE/3.0.8-1.1.1 Firefox/3.0.8,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5556
Date: 2009-04-27T08:05:50-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 27, 6:47=A0pm, Eric Hughes <eric....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ten months ago in this newsgroup, I reported a defect in the handling
> of formal package parameters in GNAT GPL 2008. The original posting is
> available from Google Groups:http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ada=
/browse_thread/thread/9aa...
>
> My question, a very simple yes-or-no one, is this: Is this defect
> corrected for a presumed 2009 release of GNAT GPL edition?
>
The answer depends from another question: did you report this bug to
AdaCore?