From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,101c38a932801b81
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Konrad Grzanek <kongra@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada.Real_Time behavior with GNAT
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <9ce244f9-4de9-4377-9d3e-37a48c4e3f69@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <f64ef241-4d24-4632-a6b9-13b7052d04e2@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<o9trq4mbol2q$.fsyyfjwx5uhi$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1b4dfb0b-ada6-416d-bb2a-f00d02a112c3@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
	<f3bdcdfe-052d-4707-a9e1-38111f145028@m71g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.26.214.69
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1206827356 13246 127.0.0.1 (29 Mar 2008 21:49:16
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:49:16 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.26.214.69;
	posting-account=8ledOwoAAACzwtoronhUWHsxPqF356aB
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.26 (Windows NT 5.1; U; pl),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20637
Date: 2008-03-29T14:49:16-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> It's even more interesting: =A0My version worked but it is slightly
> different from your original in that Timing is enclosed in Main
> procedure. =A0When I put Timing in separate package and it also worked
> fine.
>
> When I used your code exact it did show 0 time. =A0It got to do with
> elaboration sequence as was mentioned already. =A0I think for practical
> reasons real-time applications will be multi-package anyways, so I
> would not worry about it much.
>

Well, actually I started from somewhat more complicated point. I had
my Main procedure placed in Main.adb and there was also a package
called Sim.Time_Utils where all my timing procedures and types were
defined. So the initial situation was exactly like the one mentioned
by you - RT elements used inside a package body. It wasn't working so
I decided to create the Timing test.

I also tried to enclose Timing in Main like you did. With 0.0000
Total_T. So in my environment it doesn't help.