From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.13.221.151 with SMTP id g145mr12697453ywe.39.1434046888927;
        Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.101.22 with SMTP id t22mr168513qge.32.1434046888848;
 Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!z60no684862qgd.1!news-out.google.com!k20ni806qgd.0!nntp.google.com!z60no684856qgd.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <c68f9050-e32f-4c39-8337-7cc13f23953f@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=73.138.95.40;
 posting-account=wEPvUgoAAABrLeiz_LRhQ3jeEhyfWVMH
NNTP-Posting-Host: 73.138.95.40
References: <b3779aef-43d6-4186-8de5-814346f2ab0e@googlegroups.com>
 <c68f9050-e32f-4c39-8337-7cc13f23953f@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9c5f2b01-edde-4521-beb7-867cba9526d9@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada Procedure Parameters That Use the Plus Sign
From: NiGHTS <nights@unku.us>
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:21:28 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26271
Date: 2015-06-11T11:21:28-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, June 11, 2015 at 1:36:19 PM UTC-4, David Botton wrote:
> Ada allows operator overloading. So look for where "+" is defined in the code.
> 
> http://www.adaic.org/resources/add_content/standards/05rm/html/RM-6-6.html

According to your link there are two forms of the call.

A := B + C;
A := "+"(B, C);

But in this case we are dealing with apparently one parameter, so does that mean that the first form is being used with B omitted like this... 

A := + C;

If so, is it also valid to do this?

A := C +;