From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10ad19,23963231b5359f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid10ad19,public X-Google-Thread: 1073c2,23963231b5359f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid1073c2,public X-Google-Thread: 107a89,23963231b5359f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid107a89,public X-Google-Thread: 10a146,23963231b5359f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a146,public X-Google-Thread: 101deb,23963231b5359f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public X-Google-Thread: 11440e,23963231b5359f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid11440e,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,23963231b5359f74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-06 03:40:56 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: jgagon@realxchange.com (John) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ruby,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.awk,comp.lang.clarion,comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.lang.pl1,comp.lang.vrml Subject: Re: Long names are doom ? Date: 6 Jun 2001 03:40:55 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: <9c5c8b5f.0106060240.7c9c08c0@posting.google.com> References: <3B0DBD4A.82943473@my-deja.net> <3B0DD011.88FCD00E@acm.org> <9ekth1$49o$1@nnrp1.phx.gblx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.88.172.179 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 991824056 17356 127.0.0.1 (6 Jun 2001 10:40:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-support@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Jun 2001 10:40:56 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ruby:10417 comp.lang.ada:8221 comp.lang.awk:2811 comp.lang.clarion:21201 comp.lang.java.programmer:73992 comp.lang.pl1:807 comp.lang.vrml:3544 Date: 2001-06-06T10:40:56+00:00 List-Id: > > Would you be "less memorable" if you were > > Patricia_Shanahan@Association_of_Computing_Machinery.Organization > > instead of simply > > pats@acm.org? Actually, both are not that easy. > But does > that make it harder for them to remember the URL www.mtv.com? I doubt that my code is going to become as popular as mtv or www or .com. If there were standard abbreviations or popular abbreviations or common ones, I think people would understand those. One way to get a happy medium is to use Descriptive class names or somewhere in the code where you can figure out what the object is. AbbreviationConfabulator ac = new AbbreviationConfabulator(); //is not bad style. OR public static String LCD = "Least Common Denominator"; sheesh or at least comments. (that's what they're there for) The javadoc is a neat invention. someday, someone might decide to use it. ;> Long or short neither bother me unless it is intentionally obnoxious or undocumented at least somewhere in the file.