From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.13.226.3 with SMTP id l3mr36164372ywe.51.1439601337503; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:15:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.40.167 with SMTP id y7mr226764obk.14.1439601337090; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!y105no580115qge.1!news-out.google.com!o13ni15833igw.0!nntp.google.com!x6no497942igd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 18:15:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.161.113.94; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.161.113.94 References: <1215a889y9uxf$.1nolkb1ctch79$.dlg@40tude.net> <1xhfjepw437zd.137i8eiplc5lt.dlg@40tude.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <9c4e3390-6fcd-4130-a001-76d459cf460c@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: pragma/aspect Import, Convention parameters From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 01:15:37 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27454 Date: 2015-08-14T18:15:36-07:00 List-Id: On Friday, August 14, 2015 at 2:30:29 PM UTC-6, Randy Brukardt wrote: > > Right. It *is* a hell of a lot of maintenance -- that goes with the > territory -- and no one wants to build tools that help. (Conventional > version control is actively harmful in this, and the C "solution" of a > preprocessor is a guaranteed trip to unmaintainable spagetti code.) Of > course, it's possible that one *cannot* write a usable tool that would help > (I wasn't able to solve the problem adequately for our own use, and I have > tried). I don't know, it sounds kind of like (tangentially, albeit) something that Wulf's IDL would address? I'm actually starting work on something that could address this issue... but I would love to get your opinion/input.