From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Q: discrete_subtype_definition: static only cases?
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 05:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2020-06-07T05:13:58-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c45012c-a4b5-416d-bf1e-c2a8479ec641o@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rbig69$jg8$1@dont-email.me>
> No. The basic principle is that types are static (they determine the
> underlying representation) and subtypes are dynamic.
Well, there are obviously exceptions to that basic principle:
procedure SD2 is
begin
for I in 1 .. 3 loop
declare
type T is array (1 .. I) of Integer; -- I is a variable
B: T;
begin
null;
end;
end loop;
end;
:-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-07 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-07 9:27 Q: discrete_subtype_definition: static only cases? gautier_niouzes
2020-06-07 10:40 ` J-P. Rosen
2020-06-07 11:36 ` Niklas Holsti
2020-06-07 12:05 ` Niklas Holsti
2020-06-07 21:02 ` J-P. Rosen
2020-06-08 4:55 ` gautier_niouzes
2020-06-07 12:13 ` gautier_niouzes [this message]
2020-06-07 13:02 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-06-07 13:14 ` gautier_niouzes
2020-06-07 13:50 ` AdaMagica
2020-06-07 14:11 ` gautier_niouzes
2020-06-07 13:00 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2020-06-11 5:36 ` reinert
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox