From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c9d5fc258548b22a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!y36g2000pra.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address?
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 14:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <9bff52ca-6213-41da-8fa4-3a4cdd8086d3@y36g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
 <4d51905c$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <36212a7b-deab-45d9-ac45-aa29cd90c7bc@o18g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <4d51a7bb$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <iisll6$9th$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <4d52b489$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <9a8njlwvey1p.1a96yvvgdf6yu.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4d52c5e5$0$19486$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <720b7e8f-1ae2-4b3b-851e-12b08b3c99e0@r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
 <4d52dd97$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <9a8f406d-05ca-4bf3-8487-918d4e0dd634@o18g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <4d52ee47$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <e1076cab-2a7e-4762-acf4-80bf807614bf@n16g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5306a0$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
 <76c123ab-7425-44d8-b26d-b2b41a9aa42b@o7g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
 <4d5310ab$0$18057$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.28.151.164
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1297290190 1018 127.0.0.1 (9 Feb 2011 22:23:10
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 22:23:10 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: y36g2000pra.googlegroups.com; posting-host=174.28.151.164;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13)
 Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0E),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17179
Date: 2011-02-09T14:23:10-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 9, 3:09=A0pm, Hyman Rosen <hyro...@mail.com> wrote:
> On 2/9/2011 4:40 PM, Shark8 wrote:
>
> > What induction *CAN* do is tell you whether or not SumTo
> > is correctly constructed and that, barring exceptions, is
> > what guarantees the return-value to be correct.
>
> > IE It is a proof of correctness; not per se a returner of values.
>
> Oh. OK, then. But I need to know what my SumTo function is going to
> do with a given value of N. I'm trying to reason about the behavior
> of my code here, not abstract math.

...Ah, so then does this mean that when you're coding something up
you don't care about "abstract logic"?

I hate to tell you {not really} but you JUST used "abstract math" when
you presented a subprogram which yields the same results for any
given input. IOW, you have shot your own argument down.