From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,229eda63f0d80a47
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!r29g2000yqj.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Matteo Bordin <matteo.bordin@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Q: Profiles
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 05:09:59 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <9babd614-012b-4ea4-9e6b-2a462e6e52e5@r29g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
References: <4cd3e506$0$6992$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <d4cd1137-c8a5-40b3-9304-74e843040986@x42g2000yqx.googlegroups.com>
 <4cd93326$0$7668$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.98.77.125
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1289308199 15343 127.0.0.1 (9 Nov 2010 13:09:59
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 13:09:59 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: r29g2000yqj.googlegroups.com; posting-host=194.98.77.125;
 posting-account=0fK-ZgoAAACswzEJSZ3LA9AZ4FnRU7mX
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.12)
 Gecko/20101026 Firefox/3.6.12 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:15403
Date: 2010-11-09T05:09:59-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Nov 9, 12:40=A0pm, Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauh...@futureapps.de>
wrote:
> On 09.11.10 12:04, Matteo Bordin wrote:
>
> >> What if I just want the lean and efficient Ravenscar run-time
> >> but do want my tasks to terminate?
>
> > Why don't you just let your task suspend forever on an entry whose
> > barrier is never opened?
>
> The program is supposed to terminate (and I cannot change
> that setup).

I thought you needed some kind of dynamic reconfiguration of your
tasks set.