From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6705:: with SMTP id
 b5-v6mr10663886ioc.35.1529601611754;
        Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:d60f:: with SMTP id
 n15-v6mr1265966oig.6.1529601611618;
 Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!d7-v6no2315661itj.0!news-out.google.com!c20-v6ni1225itc.0!nntp.google.com!u78-v6no2358248itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87tvpw9r14.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5
References: <584564c2-9f64-4965-b045-535cdaf899c0@googlegroups.com>
 <87tvpy5tcy.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk>
 <c6a18473-573e-4cf4-b863-c1ba13ed6e95@googlegroups.com>
 <87tvpw9r14.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <9b5f53f4-a6ce-4c7b-aeec-911fdf2a8f95@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Why are Ada compilers difficult to write ?
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 17:20:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53230
Date: 2018-06-21T10:20:11-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, 21 June 2018 15:02:18 UTC+1, Jacob Sparre Andersen  wrote:

> But you would still have to document what it implements.  The Ada
> community seems to be slightly more critical consumers, when it comes to
> compiler quality.

I didn't say you wouldn't have to, you were implying you cannot call a compiler an Ada compiler if it doesn't support the whole language, which is no longer true, that was what I was pointing out.