From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada advocacy
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:30:52 +0200
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <9b4mcjvcb17q$.q1f1gdlz3mq5$.dlg@40tude.net>
References: 
 <19595886.4450.1332248078686.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfy7>
 <2012032020582259520-rblove@airmailnet> <jkc59a$hs5$2@speranza.aioe.org>
 <12ee9bc5-3bdf-4ac0-b805-5f10b3859ff4@googlegroups.com>
 <vhcvr8d4kq6ribdqeeb0b857ei5aa5luiv@4ax.com>
 <6c58fae4-6c34-4d7a-ab71-e857e55897c0@x6g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>
 <wccvc5b49yc.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <op.w2g9br0kule2fv@cardamome>
 <246849b7-7a53-48a2-8f64-ff6dfb2086ce@googlegroups.com>
 <521dbbbb$0$9520$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <1spiuuuxfwqq4$.46v46qs98684.dlg@40tude.net>
 <521de20d$0$9507$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <8iym21y3cv14.1vuethuo3ua53$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <521df1e2$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <1oppje6lzatpk.pritovj8qcbj.dlg@40tude.net>
 <1e2af50b-1112-41b6-b46b-296dfe895edf@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: vRnt2AWmw7ZRya91cSDecw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
X-Original-Bytes: 2412
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:183204
Date: 2013-08-28T19:30:52+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 08:06:14 -0700 (PDT), Eryndlia Mavourneen wrote:

> On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 9:07:34 AM UTC-5, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:49:51 +0200, G.B. wrote:
>>   ...
>> A [typed] language where synchronization primitives are first class objects
>> shall have this. Unfortunately nobody knows how.
> 
> The compromise would seem to be the use of task interface types.

Interfaces never helped reuse (anything actually).

> These
> can be used to specify portions of code, which then can be combined into
> the desired task structure, including sequence, for specific needs.

This is already possible to do using procedures. Replacing them with
class-wide operations brings nothing. Less, actually, because class-wide
operations on interfaces could not access task object data.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de