From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,79bbf7e359159d0d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-11 05:35:11 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.gv.tsc.tdk.com!falcon.america.net!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!not-for-mail
From: "Ayende Rahien" <Dont@spam.me>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: newbie can't get exceptions to work!
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:24:34 +0200
Organization: (Posted via) GTS Netcom - Public USENET Service
 http://pubnews.netcom.net.uk
Sender: ayende@softhome.net
Message-ID: <9b1iru$aqs$1@taliesin.netcom.net.uk>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104061258090.5067-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <wccsnjlvfex.fsf@world.std.com>
 <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104061524390.5067-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <wcc1yr4v77b.fsf@world.std.com>
 <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104071403390.4484-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <9ao1if$cq9$1@taliesin.netcom.net.uk> <3ACFC902.115624A1@mindspring.com>
 <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104081508050.8921-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <nlkA6.843$FY5.48223@www.newsranger.com>
 <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104090948440.6359-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <86u23yszjo.fsf@acm.org>
 <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104091147440.6359-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
 <86wv8sfwec.fsf@acm.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: diup-181-215.inter.net.il
X-Trace: taliesin.netcom.net.uk 986992320 11100 213.8.181.215 (11 Apr 2001
 12:32:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@corp.netcom.net.uk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:32:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.60.2296.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.60.2296.0000
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:6751
Date: 2001-04-11T15:24:34+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Laurent Guerby" <guerby@acm.org> wrote in message
news:86wv8sfwec.fsf@acm.org...

> And I of course forgot the mandatory () for function calls without
> args silliness ;-).

No, I disagree with you about this one. It make reading far easier.
You *know* that it's a function, and not some variable.
Beside, it remind me of VB's abominationable () behaviour.