From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ffc1e,d0d32a18bbb61bb0 X-Google-Attributes: gidffc1e,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0d32a18bbb61bb0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-04-04 00:40:06 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!64.71.136.253.MISMATCH!news!news.he.net!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!news.uar.net!carrier.kiev.ua!news.ukr.net!news.tsystems.kiev.ua!info.elvisti.kiev.ua!glukr!news.paco.odessa.ua!not-for-mail From: igor@notformail.paco.net Newsgroups: comp.programming.threads,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD a better choice for threads/tasking? Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 07:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Organization: PACOnet ISP Sender: Igor Khasilev Message-ID: <9aeiek$6tt$1@ultra.paco.odessa.ua> References: <3AC4EE29.424057F6@ebox.tninet.se> <52Jx6.39238$9O3.723041@news.total.net> <871yranq1w.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <3ACA15AC.31C02720@bga.com> <3ACA194F.14F2D76F@webmaster.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ss5.paco.odessa.ua X-Trace: ultra.paco.odessa.ua 986369300 7101 195.114.128.14 (4 Apr 2001 07:28:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@paco.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 07:28:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000227 ("For Her Light") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.5.1 (sun4m)) Xref: supernews.google.com comp.programming.threads:3488 comp.lang.ada:6435 Date: 2001-04-04T07:28:20+00:00 List-Id: In comp.programming.threads David Schwartz wrote: > > > "Arthur H. Gold" wrote: > >> No argument there; the only problem is that in this respect >> linuxthreads contravenes the POSIX standard for threads, >> resulting in portability problems. > > It's not that terribly difficult to avoid using signals in a > multithreaded program. This is one of the many cases where the standard > is lacking. 'set[re]uid' is another. > Exactly. And one more, if my memory serve me correctly: with linuxthreads pthread_attr_setstackaddr kill programm. Maybe this is fixed in new releases. -- Igor Khasilev | PACO Links, igor at paco dot net |