From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1400b61b3f80c1e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: gpriv@axonx.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Are there noticable differences in Ada acceptance by country?
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:21:52 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <9ada5b92-bce2-44ca-9e1e-8f5fc773cd23@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <a3e4c9c5-9e54-4c58-a6e7-db5e78a17a4d@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
	<87d4pr6413.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <47e0fc15$0$89167$157c6196@dreader1.cybercity.dk>
	<aeec2c10-7e9e-4dcd-98e9-f81cb6cc3f78@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<13u2t1a2s141531@corp.supernews.com>
 <1fac7b25-a11f-4199-97ad-45688318e424@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
	<m2eja5cfi9.fsf@mac.com> <1kv438li1fcvq.ox99qnglkog5.dlg@40tude.net>
	<m263vhca6p.fsf@mac.com>
 <9adb8bbd-5058-4406-b8b9-2ccfbc141264@u72g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
	<m2skykav5o.fsf@mac.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.196.71.114
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1206127422 23614 127.0.0.1 (21 Mar 2008 19:23:42
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:23:42 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=151.196.71.114;
	posting-account=YaY8rAoAAAAAnFXOECY3BGVJsrvFJCgy
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 SPARKS
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.12)
	Gecko/20080201 Firefox/2.0.0.12,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20538
Date: 2008-03-21T12:21:52-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Mar 21, 12:39 pm, Simon Wright <simon.j.wri...@mac.com> wrote:
> gp...@axonx.com writes:
> > From my own C experience: using code from different sources X and Y
> > coordinates in function calls were in different order: foo(x,y);
> > boo(height, width), etc. Easy to overlook.
>
> That was my point (I expect I failed to make it properly): if you use
> a record for Coordinate, your chance of getting the components the
> wrong way round is hugely reduced, and I don't think the added value
> of making the H & V components different _types_ is worth the added
> cost.

Is there any runtime cost of using new type if no range is defined?  I
thought that

type X_T is new float;

should be equivalent to float and have effect only at compile time.

George.