From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.66.249.100 with SMTP id yt4mr6985805pac.42.1443684332702; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:25:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.182.81.163 with SMTP id b3mr50800oby.30.1443684332638; Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:25:32 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.glorb.com!kq10no14454735igb.0!news-out.google.com!z4ni7631ign.0!nntp.google.com!kq10no15110237igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:25:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1r88k387kddye.1hpclmn13sjb2$.dlg@40tude.net> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=185.48.108.5; posting-account=IcHmbgoAAABVfpbjrkJyy4Yb3hmce3tn NNTP-Posting-Host: 185.48.108.5 References: <26b4bb33-0ebc-4181-bea6-07f1e36ca288@googlegroups.com> <1r88k387kddye.1hpclmn13sjb2$.dlg@40tude.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <9aa08966-6072-4d35-9089-d404a5ff1a43@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Addressing in Object Ada v/s GNAT (2013) showing Vast Differences From: Lucas Redding Injection-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 07:25:32 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27888 Date: 2015-10-01T00:25:32-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, September 21, 2015 at 5:49:02 PM UTC+1, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 04:12:44 -0700 (PDT), Lucas Redding wrote: >=20 > > In fact I am stumbling on portability of the rep clauses. >=20 > Which is an oxymoron. Representation clauses are meant to make the code > non-portable. >=20 > --=20 > Regards, > Dmitry A. Kazakov > http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de Thanks for pointing that out Dimitri Come to think of it you are right. However it depends what and where you want to port. In my case I wish to port the same application and same data to a different= compiler. In this case the rep clause is essential for the port. So like l= ife itself, it is only meaningful if within context. ;=AC)