From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,25457a5aee9eaa04 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.196.232 with SMTP id ip8mr5863719pbc.6.1338395891185; Wed, 30 May 2012 09:38:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: pr3ni66551pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!news2.arglkargh.de!news.theremailer.net!frell.theremailer.net!anonymous From: Fritz Wuehler Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at . Identifying the real sender is technically impossible. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Fuzzy machine learning framework v1.2 References: Message-ID: <9a929187dd9f032a23f3774be044229e@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> Precedence: anon Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 18:38:09 +0200 Mail-To-News-Contact: abuse@frell.theremailer.net Organization: Frell Anonymous Remailer Date: 2012-05-30T18:38:09+02:00 List-Id: > I feel many people run around the topic, but miss the real topic. Face it: > when do complains about GPL comes? Answer: when it disallow commercial > activities, and further more, states it's bad. Yes, I know officially GPL > does not disallow it, but every one know it disallow it in practice, and > comes with a culture which say so. If the GPL also came with something to > solve that paradox, there would be less complains, but it don't, indeed. I don't care what the terms of the GPL license are since I don't use GPL code. I would like an unemcumbered copy of gcc-Ada just for principle. I do object to the lie of calling GPL a "free software license" since it is the least free and most intentionally misleading software license that exists today. I can't answer your question, because my issue with GPL and Stallman and the so-called FSF is because they're evil, lying Marxists. I have no objection to them setting whatever terms they like, it's theirs to do that with. Just don't call it freedom. > By the way, the license is not what matters to people, its the > price. You said a mouthful there buddy! Stallman's propaganda and agenda is only successful because most people want something for nothing. No thanks, Stallman can keep his code and the virus it comes with.