From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,90108ed846e3f1bf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!x13g2000yqf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why constructing functions is a mess [was Language lawyer
	question: task activation
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:12:17 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <9a74a1ed-cb45-45f9-8e07-25c6340a22d8@x13g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <ccf8fc4b-80e3-4732-84e3-16c4e2d10c3d@v39g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
	<1dusr7frk73m7.nlsagplge0hk.dlg@40tude.net>
 <09a7aab3-d105-4a40-b25b-e2824cb12f89@j1g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
	<rv6zobw6fror.csu22kh631qi$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <24bdd0df-9554-49de-9c5e-99572c9cdf34@g38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
	<d1d318e7-9cd8-4f28-9cc8-afa3752e711e@g38g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
	<1v0f2pkso7p50.vein84avao5t.dlg@40tude.net>
 <499ede41$0$32665$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
	<1lhxmo6l2ypux.bei2ffp1m3e$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <499f2c59$0$31868$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
	<1vcaimc8kjj30$.kf3rsd670ebp$.dlg@40tude.net> <go9t07$lht$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<1gxn72yzshp07$.6ytqydmmz37u.dlg@40tude.net>
 <49a92c29$0$32670$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
	<1wzjy9pzbft1m.1lut7nszfkzmp$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.0.150.10
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1235862738 32006 127.0.0.1 (28 Feb 2009 23:12:18
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:12:18 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x13g2000yqf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.0.150.10;
	posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US;
	rv:1.9.0.6) Gecko/2009011912 Firefox/3.0.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4829
Date: 2009-02-28T15:12:17-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 28 Lut, 14:45, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:

> > class T
> > {
> > public:
> > =A0 virtual void op() =3D 0;
> > private:
> > =A0 T(char constraint) : c(constraint) {}
> > =A0 char c;
> > };
>
> No, the constructor in the example must be public.

It can be also *protected* (which in C++ means hidden from the world,
but exposed to derived types) and I think this would better fit what
you try to explain.

--
Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com

Database Access Library for Ada: www.inspirel.com/soci-ada