From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-09 00:23:57 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn13feed!wn12feed!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi_feed4!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Marshall Spight" Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada References: <9fa75d42.0304230424.10612b1a@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305020516.bdba239@posting.google.com> <82347202.0305021418.4719da45@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305060521.400f1d80@posting.google.com> <82347202.0305061103.2ddd98e4@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305070504.6866e7a3@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305070929.2d7a0d4c@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305080548.1afde9b7@posting.google.com> Subject: Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada mandate, and why it collapsed and died) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <9IIua.780556$3D1.429428@sccrnsc01> NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.236.48.146 X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com X-Trace: sccrnsc01 1052465029 12.236.48.146 (Fri, 09 May 2003 07:23:49 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 07:23:49 GMT Organization: AT&T Broadband Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 07:23:49 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:63363 comp.object:63068 comp.lang.ada:37091 Date: 2003-05-09T07:23:49+00:00 List-Id: "Wesley Groleau" wrote in message news:qaOcnZhr4PwRvyajXTWcoA@gbronline.com... > > > as an object-oriented extension of C. Java became popular because it was > > deliberately designed to give C and C++ programmers features (like GC) > > that had already been around in other languages for years. > > No, Java became popular partly from hype and partly > because it is better than C and C++ but not enough > to intimidate users of those languages. Don't forget anti-Microsoft sentiment! That has been a powerful force in Java's favor. Marshall