From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3e5f85a85cdab16e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-22 06:30:51 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!bignews.mediaways.net!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.freenet.de!news1.dtag.de!newsserv.vs.dasa.de!news
From: "Oliver Kellogg" <oliver.kellogg@vs.dasa.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should this be legal?
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:21:53 +0100
Organization: Daimler-Benz Aerospace
Message-ID: <99d2du$vt8@newsserv.vs.dasa.de>
References: <99cjt2$v9g@newsserv.vs.dasa.de> <3ab9dcf8$1@pull.gecm.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kellol.vs.dasa.de
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5991
Date: 2001-03-22T15:21:53+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In message <3ab9dcf8$1@pull.gecm.com>, Martin Dowie wrote:

>ObjectAda 7.2 SE returns the following errors:
> [...]

Thanks for trying this out.
For better top-down reading I had put the methods in the private part,
in the original code they were public. (The methods aren't the point
anyway - you can leave them away altogether)

-- Oliver