From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.52.177.138 with SMTP id cq10mr49454007vdc.11.1433431378859; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:22:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.106.247 with SMTP id e110mr506398qgf.7.1433431378796; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 08:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Path: buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!z60no265336qgd.1!news-out.google.com!k20ni45168qgd.0!nntp.google.com!q107no78973qgd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:22:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=105.210.0.212; posting-account=orbgeAkAAADzWCTlruxuX_Ts4lIq8C5J NNTP-Posting-Host: 105.210.0.212 References: <59a4ee45-23fb-4b0e-905c-cc16ce46b5f6@googlegroups.com> <46b2dce1-2a1c-455d-b041-3a9d217e2c3f@googlegroups.com> <3277d769-6503-4c7f-885f-3a730762b620@googlegroups.com> <9fa68fb7-89f0-42b3-8f25-20e70cb34d63@googlegroups.com> <87egm3u662.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <20c56bea-2803-4aa9-a626-2d25e480df20@googlegroups.com> <1dmgofrqo3xn5$.1p4241xr4z92p.dlg@40tude.net> <1066il1b5nk21.ioykgza5bnsw.dlg@40tude.net> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <99904f24-e0e4-4f99-8a6a-109c2d55d3fa@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Build language with weak typing, then add scaffolding later to strengthen it? From: jan.de.kruyf@gmail.com Injection-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 15:22:58 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:193486 Date: 2015-06-04T08:22:58-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, June 1, 2015 at 11:36:57 PM UTC+2, Randy Brukardt wrote: > Ah, yes, one of my old college textbooks. The professor of the class had > never used it before, and we ended up spending lots of class-time trying to > figure out how the algorithms should work. They were riddled with errors. > Apparently, running the sample programs was a novel concept. (Dunno if those > problems were fixed in a later edition, hopefully. I've heard from others > that they thought the book was useful, so YMMV) > > Randy. Randy, you are confusing Stone Age with post-modernity again ;> >From you writing I gather that that must have been shortly after the ALGOL age as described in the HeerdeBeer thesis above. I was trying my hand at basic at the time, so perhaps we all came a long way since then. cheers and keep smiling j.