From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.236.184.165 with SMTP id s25mr11103884yhm.0.1395367997055;
 Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.109.98 with SMTP id k89mr3513qgf.11.1395367997031; Thu,
 20 Mar 2014 19:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!hw13no6785746qab.1!news-out.google.com!du2ni10182qab.0!nntp.google.com!w5no6813379qac.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <lget9l$8qe$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=90.203.156.53;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.203.156.53
References: <5151491a-14c3-4138-bcb5-f29108aeefb9@googlegroups.com>
 <b750be91-adb8-4630-90a2-ae700a3e9e67@googlegroups.com>
 <fKSdnQj47oHXCLTO4p2dnAA@giganews.com>
 <801079196416966973.679877laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <ly61n93wax.fsf@pushface.org>
 <2031237242417012217.543618laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <ly1txx3syh.fsf@pushface.org> <lget9l$8qe$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <98924b8b-19d2-4780-9fb9-a798b19d9c44@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Kickstarter for beginning work on a new open-source Compiler
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 02:13:17 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Original-Bytes: 1996
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:185254
Date: 2014-03-20T19:13:16-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, 20 March 2014 14:17:26 UTC, J-P. Rosen  wrote:

> Since there is currently only one implementation of Ada 2012, and since
> this implementation's ASIS is following the compiler, the decision was
> taken that the only sensible path was to let Gnat do the work, and
> standardize on that.

Thanks, at least I know where to look for the specs. Hopefully though, the ASIS WG will come out with the proper specs soon.

And FYI, another reason why we need another competing implementation :D

Luke.