From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_SPAM,
	INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: ff499,32898cca6ca4143e
X-Google-Attributes: gidff499,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,32898cca6ca4143e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Andy Gaynor <silver@mail.webspan.net>
Subject: Re: Compiler Optimisation?
Date: 1998/12/13
Message-ID: <98-12-023@comp.compilers>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 421863382
Sender: johnl@iecc.com
References: <98-12-010@comp.compilers>
X-submission-address: compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address: compilers-request@iecc.com
Organization: Nightmare
Keywords: optimize
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.compilers
X-FAQ-and-archives: http://www.iecc.com/compilers
Date: 1998-12-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I recall an interesting section in "Compiling with Continuations"
by Appel in which he explores the effects of enabling and disabling
specific optimizations in an ML compiler.  Good reading.