From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.107.3.79 with SMTP id 76mr18053142iod.134.1523286198638; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 08:03:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6050:: with SMTP id v16-v6mr1093366otj.4.1523286198303; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 08:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!paganini.bofh.team!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!e130-v6no145787itb.0!news-out.google.com!u64-v6ni4150itb.0!nntp.google.com!e130-v6no145781itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 08:03:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=47.185.233.194; posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.233.194 References: <1b44444f-c1b3-414e-84fb-8798961487c3@googlegroups.com> <62ee0aac-49da-4925-b9aa-a16695b3fc45@googlegroups.com> <9879872e-c18a-4667-afe5-41ce0f54559f@googlegroups.com> <80db2d05-744f-4201-ba1b-4436f8040491@googlegroups.com> <59f9ab6d-d6ba-45ff-a6f0-c5699983d9e8@googlegroups.com> <1a390e22-f49f-4028-8e58-ca4d0f51e4b6@googlegroups.com> <8fca2fed-2721-48dc-95e5-5b98e7c1fa70@googlegroups.com> <51392e2f-aab5-4d76-8f39-86d3a61c8038@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <97f7c1a3-7d48-42e3-b920-542ef74ded36@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Interesting article on ARG work From: "Dan'l Miller" Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 15:03:18 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51415 Date: 2018-04-09T08:03:17-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, April 9, 2018 at 9:44:17 AM UTC-5, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 09/04/2018 16:36, Dan'l Miller wrote: > >> Both examples present would be illegal code. What is your point? To ha= ve > >> it legal? > >=20 > > I have already answered that completely in my prior replies: an exempl= ary implementation would compile both sides of the @-code presence and abse= nce to reveal to Mr. Unwise Programmer his uncouthness right away=E2=80=94e= ither via GLR, GLL, or brute-force invoking the compiler twice, once with a= nd once without @-code. >=20 > And the problem/point is? > > Assuming that you read at all before posting, my point now is becoming: > > methinks something else is going on here with you, Dmitry.=20 troller fisherman=E2=80=94an elaborate and sophisticated one most of the ti= me in replies to other top-level postings, but you were sloppier this time = herein, accidentally more directly revealing what you do