From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a40f6d312191b68e
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.224.190.193 with SMTP id dj1mr20793991qab.6.1356890750100;
        Sun, 30 Dec 2012 10:05:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.49.35.77 with SMTP id f13mr5858216qej.4.1356890750083; Sun, 30
 Dec 2012 10:05:50 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 k2ni3151qap.0!nntp.google.com!ee4no8264809qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 10:05:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <ly623ky6h9.fsf@pushface.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=71.229.206.178;
 posting-account=eLk0BgoAAAA-yA75xm1L7heSizMaESVg
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.229.206.178
References: <9242b176-7050-46f8-a65d-6091aa4b2de8@googlegroups.com>
 <0bc6a851-8eea-4279-b616-3f7895049d4b@googlegroups.com>
 <6638b519-7fad-4908-9b80-3a43e6a0b8f7@googlegroups.com>
 <ly623ky6h9.fsf@pushface.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <97d92098-cb4d-452a-91b9-eea7eb62eb41@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: A thicker binding for Lapack
From: jpwoodruff@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 18:05:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2012-12-30T10:05:49-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Saturday, December 29, 2012 12:59:46 PM UTC-7, Simon Wright wrote:
> jpwoodruff@gmail.com writes:
> 
> 
> 
> > Conclusion:   transpose appears necessary.
> 
> 
> 
> For info, the compiler (well, GNAT) will automatically transpose when
> 
> doing assignment between arrays with different conventions. And it's
> 
> quicker (not by very much at -O2, though).
> 

I'll be darned.  You are both right about pragma Convention.  I am
going to unwrite some code.  Even my old gnat gpl 2010 got it right. 
I need to (re)learn to trust Lady Ada.


>From Simon's context, I found System.Generic_Real_LAPACK. There is
quite a lot there.  I want to spend some time reading that, then
determine if (as I suspect) the problem I stated has already been
solved by the structures there.

John