From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,25457a5aee9eaa04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.68.195.165 with SMTP id if5mr6960391pbc.1.1338217017118;
        Mon, 28 May 2012 07:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni58872pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.teledata-fn.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool1.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail
User-Agent: NewsTap/3.5.5 (iPad)
From: Georg Bauhaus <rm-host.bauhaus@maps.arcor.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: 
 <97770545359907417.091682rm-host.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de>
Subject: Re: Fuzzy machine learning framework v1.2
References: <jpvo0q$1on$1@dont-email.me>
 <1j399t809qd94.1no66gtodvgmn$.dlg@40tude.net>
Date: 28 May 2012 14:56:55 GMT
Organization: Arcor
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 May 2012 16:56:55 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: fdf12ac1.newsspool4.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=ESf7[mGDHb`016@cHD@m;j4IUK<Cl32<a4Fo<]lROoRa8kF<OcfhCOk:5mIKIh2\okPCY\c7>ejVhA[dRXKmTP]hX9NQjlnNVIf
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-05-28T16:56:55+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 13:36:53 +0200, J-P. Rosen wrote:
> 
>> Le 28/05/2012 12:08, Dmitry A. Kazakov a écrit :
>>> This release is packaged for Windows, Fedora (yum) and Debian (apt). The
>>> software is public domain (licensed under GM GPL).
>> Just to be picky: if it's licensed under GMGPL, it's free software, but
>> it's not public domain. Public domain means that you give up all your
>> intellectual rights (possibly allowing someone to take your work and
>> putting a restrictive license upon it).
> 
> I thought GMGPL allowed derivative works to be restricted as anybody
> wanted?

The exception says it applies to instances of the given work.
LGPL sounds different.

In fact, it is not possible to give up originators rights under
German law. If authors publish a work, the connection with
their work cannot normally be removed. They may give rights to use
their work, though, within bounds imposed by overruling law
as usual.

There is no public domain (US style) in continental
Europe, TTBOMK. (The same term may mean something 
different in the UK, IIRC.)