From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,fef3ad775ef4b0b7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!k7g2000hsd.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: lbarowski@gmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada for 1st year students Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 04:31:31 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <9771e559-2ce5-4339-a73b-c1bb5720612f@k7g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> References: <60e0c5f0-1e17-4add-b21e-b1ef622d5233@v13g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <67e0151c-ecdb-4a7a-b36b-6853f78e72df@b1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <7e002aa1-59cb-438b-af58-9227a4ecf7b6@i18g2000prf.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.228.91.133 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1225193492 3699 127.0.0.1 (28 Oct 2008 11:31:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: k7g2000hsd.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.228.91.133; posting-account=g0aIYQkAAABS3VLtu6u_AVIBllsWHSme User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080829 Firefox/2.0.0.17,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2509 Date: 2008-10-28T04:31:31-07:00 List-Id: On Oct 25, 3:36 pm, Marco wrote: > But I do think adding the "j" to the name was a mistake, most folks > don't care what a program is written in (unless it is too slow). Since Java did take off, especially for education, the "j" probably did us more good than harm. > At the time, it seemed like Ada was being abandoned for the > upstart Java. We never really liked the Java based version, > because at the time, it seemed a little slow. It was slow at first, but we had confidence in Moore's Law. Having a more-or-less single codebase with only two installer builds has saved us tons of development and testing time in the long run.