From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,d541063ff843658f
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.66.172.76 with SMTP id ba12mr1914660pac.26.1361816330865;
        Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:18:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.50.5.197 with SMTP id u5mr1276578igu.0.1361816330767; Mon,
 25 Feb 2013 10:18:50 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 ov8ni17399pbb.1!nntp.google.com!jn4no5080989pbb.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:18:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <kgg6b2$kma$1@ccpntc8.in2p3.fr>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=69.153.56.254;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.153.56.254
References: <kgfdsp$tb0$1@ccpntc8.in2p3.fr>
 <nospam-A31E64.07402825022013@news.aioe.org>
 <kgg6b2$kma$1@ccpntc8.in2p3.fr>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <973a091e-4650-41d8-bddf-f229abcb5adc@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Parallel_Simulation
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:18:50 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2013-02-25T10:18:50-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, February 25, 2013 11:17:23 AM UTC-6, Vincent LAFAGE wrote:
> 
> Would you think of another way?

Well, you could forgo the independent RNG requirement and make a protected object that is say a stack filled with random values and is replenished as-needed.

OR you could have your different RNGs nested into the task itself (say the declaration area) -- then make the seed value take values from the protected object above.