From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,119826e558c913d7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "John Griffiths" <John@NOSPaMwhere-uk.ltd.uk>
Subject: Re: Ada vs. C++ in defense projects
Date: 2000/11/06
Message-ID: <973539823.2970.0.nnrp-13.d4f02ffb@news.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 690396484
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk:212.240.47.251
References: <8tv04t$n80$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3a04bb7a@rsl2.rslnet.net>
 <3A04C67F.FEB1D90A@netwood.net> <8u2o3d$hft$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 973539823 nnrp-13:2970 NO-IDENT
 no-dns-yet.demon.co.uk:212.240.47.251
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 2000-11-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Question : has the (any,all) JVM been validated for safety critical
applications?

TTFN John

"Robert Dewar" <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8u2o3d$hft$1@nnrp1.deja.com...
> In article <3A04C67F.FEB1D90A@netwood.net>,
>   "E. Robert Tisdale" <edwin@netwood.net> wrote:
> > If you can find an Ada compiler which emits byte code for a
> > JVM,
> > you may be able to convince them that they should implement
> > safety critical applications in Ada instead of Java.
> > Otherwise, you should probably just forget about Ada.
<snip/>