From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:690:: with SMTP id
 138-v6mr1714926itv.11.1525385164558;
        Thu, 03 May 2018 15:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3c4:: with SMTP id f62-v6mr1759904otf.8.1525385164391;
 Thu, 03 May 2018 15:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!paganini.bofh.team!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!f199-v6no983732itd.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni1163itb.0!nntp.google.com!f199-v6no983730itd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 15:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <lyk1sk1kd4.fsf@pushface.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=47.185.233.194;
 posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.233.194
References: <9c3a75d6-a01f-4cfa-9493-10b8b082ead8@googlegroups.com>
 <114db2c4-1e8c-4506-8d7c-df955dd9f808@googlegroups.com>
 <lyk1sk1kd4.fsf@pushface.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <972ec047-0c7d-4447-8db7-55edc21f0e7a@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Precisely why can't official FSF GNAT maintainers copy bug fixes
 in GNAT & its GCC-contained runtime en masse from GNAT GPL Community Edition?
From: "Dan'l Miller" <optikos@verizon.net>
Injection-Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 22:06:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51952
Date: 2018-05-03T15:06:04-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 4:48:26 PM UTC-5, Simon Wright wrote:
> (3b) Nor have I evidence that new AdaCore work trickles through into the
> FSF system.

Yes, that is the beef that some people are claiming:  AdaCore GNAT work not showing up in FSF GNAT.  I'm glad you concur at some level there.

> The thing to remember that AdaCore don't have separate people working 
> on customer, CE, or FSF compilers. 
> ...
> And they are the official maintainers. 

Yes, one would expect AdaCore GNAT work to show up in FSF GNAT if they are in fact the only official maintainers, wouldn't one?