From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:92d5:: with SMTP id u204-v6mr180503iod.103.1527213293069; Thu, 24 May 2018 18:54:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:738f:: with SMTP id j15-v6mr270426otk.6.1527213292614; Thu, 24 May 2018 18:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!85.12.16.70.MISMATCH!peer03.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!v8-v6no1610751itc.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni1217itb.0!nntp.google.com!u74-v6no1614625itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 18:54:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=47.185.233.194; posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.233.194 References: <5c2523c1-9ea5-453c-b80e-9cb0dcd16de0@googlegroups.com> <293cf892-1320-49e6-a25f-a36ea098cd34@googlegroups.com> <294fa0cd-ec72-4f0f-8065-0a3d5e1087fa@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <970593e8-2013-49d9-8a71-d5cf160b7fe3@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: DragonEgg has been revived From: "Dan'l Miller" Injection-Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 01:54:53 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Bytes: 3496 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2384555624 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52660 Date: 2018-05-24T18:54:52-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 4:59:43 PM UTC-5, Chris M Moore wrote: > On 24/05/2018 20:26, Dan'l Miller wrote: > > Specifically where in the set {GPLv3, RLEv3.1, copyright law's body of = statutes in USCode, copyright treaties to which the USA is a signatory} doe= s it overtly clearly say anything even remotely in the ballpark of that sen= tence above? I want to read it with my own eyes. I want reading comprehen= sion. (And hearsay commentary on some forum from 2009 where people specula= te and parrot what other people say doesn't count; I want original sources = and seminal references, such as quotations from members of that set above.) >=20 > I mean who uses "overtly clearly"? Someone who wants to arrive directly rapidly at the =E2=80=A2fully correct= =E2=80=A2 answer within the root/seminal normative reference-documents=E2= =80=94as opposed to the alternative: =E2=80=9810 blind men in India feelin= g different parts of the elephant=E2=80=99, jawboning the same-old same-old= parroted partially-correct/cherrypicked hearsay for yet another 10 years. (Am I the very first person in all these 10 years who publicly posts=E2=80= =94in any public forum on the planet=E2=80=94a walk-through step-by-step as= I read the plain-language meanings of the license applied to juicy real-wo= rld use-cases, detailing precisely how each of the contractual-terms cause = the viral license to spread versus to not spread in each of the different s= cenarios? If not, post a URL to an analogous step-by-step walk-through of = the back-&-forth interplay of Source Code, Object Code, Target Code, Compil= ation Process, Eligible Compilation Process, and so forth. The walk-throug= h is little different than a sportscaster calling the plays of a game, real= ly=E2=80=94okay, its a whole lot more boring & esoteric, but still.)