From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ff499,542842c3353b6338,start X-Google-Attributes: gidff499,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,542842c3353b6338,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,542842c3353b6338,start X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public From: Yves BM Subject: ACES (compiler evaluation) Date: 1997/10/29 Message-ID: <97-10-128@comp.compilers>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 285907597 Sender: johnl@iecc.com Keywords: Ada, question Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.software-eng,comp.compilers Date: 1997-10-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Hello, I am currently in the process of installing ACES, the Ada compiler evaluation software tool, and I am looking for an honest critic of the results this tool is expected generate. The documentation states that a complete evaluation (executable size, lib management, Ada 95 language features, optimization efficacy.....) will take close to 6 to 8 weeks for installation and thorough evaluation (I am assuming that is if one interested in exercising the entire test suites!!!).. Before I commit myself I would like to hear about any interesting thoughts on this tool. I have installed the necessary pretest and harness codes and currently trying to resolve a problem with pretest number 5 of 15. I am attempting to evaluate GNAT 10.10 on an HP platform (HPUX 10.1). Thank You Yves BM Aces intro can be viewed at http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/compilers/aces/README.html -- Send compilers articles to compilers@iecc.com, meta-mail to compilers-request@iecc.com. Archives at http://www.iecc.com/compilers