From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f23f789345652e5b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Users of the BON notation among Ada users ?
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:44:27 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <96df8f4d-58a1-4f6c-921b-e5a76b305ab8@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <c06663c9-c55a-4721-8800-9d01b26902d2@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<30be5a15-ed2e-4853-b9ba-f4ff2e770aa8@r36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<llr8n4dqete6g4u4309ledvn6ql9f6eu2t@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.198.58.33
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1232477067 22391 127.0.0.1 (20 Jan 2009 18:44:27
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:44:27 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.198.58.33;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3452
Date: 2009-01-20T10:44:27-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 19 jan, 13:22, Brian Drummond <brian_drumm...@btconnect.com> wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for an interesting discussion. It inspired me to find
> a second-hand copy of "Seamless Object-oriented software archtecture" by
> Walden and Nerson.
>
> It was in perfect condition; in approximately ten years in a University
> library (from a Scottish university with a pretty good reputation for
> computing science) it had been withdrawn precisely ... never.
>
> - Brian
Not surprising : I started this thread with a comparison of the number
of result returned for a request about UML and BON. Further more, the
BON official web site seems mostly dead for at least some years.

But this does not tell anything about its usefulness