From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: G.B. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to get nice with GNAT? Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 01:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <969708583438656051.436159nonlegitur-futureapps.invalid@reader80.eternal-september.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 01:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d40e6907f5847459b3e577b434912679"; logging-data="12060"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BHqgp6wOo+bQjzm9/BZxiYqZoUtXO7sk=" User-Agent: NewsTap/3.5.5 (iPad) Cancel-Lock: sha1:aN+rBBlx1yinoOeT2bDW0PxXXAI= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23726 Date: 2014-11-26T01:25:36+00:00 List-Id: Simon Wright wrote: . > > We discovered that some misguided people had used > > exception > when others => null; > end; The guidance that code like a silencing exception handler can be following may be orienting towards presentational flawlessness (polish). When demonstrating a program, the audience can include hounds. Then either the program must appear to them to be without flaw, which in case of exceptions on the screen it isn't. Or, the presenter must be capable of silencing rhetoric. Otherwise, the hounds will snap and the presenter is going to be a toy. A business attitude suggests this kind of reasoning to less technically minded, but all the more simple-minded strategists.