From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9def0a9c238c7bd8
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-12 07:44:05 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Arthur Schwarz <schwarza@gdls.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada 0x Wish List
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:25:17 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <968v8j$4qe$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <RKIh6.3190$j45.247550@e3500-chi1.usenetserver.com>
 <87u260bba1.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.131.15.194
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Feb 12 15:25:17 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows 95)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x58.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 209.131.15.194
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDaschw1309
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5171
Date: 2001-02-12T15:25:17+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <87u260bba1.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>,
  Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:
> "Peter Richtmyer" <pmr@efortress.com> writes:
>
> > 2) In a subroutine, would like to be able to declare variables that
> > are "persistent", like C "static" variables and only used by the one
> > subroutine.
>
> This feature wouldn't interoperate with tasking, so I think it's a bad
> idea.

Don't understand this, could you explain? I would think that if the
intent is to have non-reentrant task bodies containing 'static'
variables it would work - with some 'sugar' for synchronization.

art


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/