From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c6e6cdf6ff50e684
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-12 03:44:12 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Rod Chapman <r_c_chapman@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Representation clause for enumeratives
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:32:08 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <968hjo$pl6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <95tqbh$ag7$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <95uh36$to0$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <962ndo$g08$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.114.91.187
X-Article-Creation-Date: Mon Feb 12 11:32:08 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.73 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 PROXY,
 1.0 x72.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 193.114.91.187
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDr_c_chapman
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5153
Date: 2001-02-12T11:32:08+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <962ndo$g08$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
  Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> wrote:
> In article <95uh36$to0$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
>   Rod Chapman <r_c_chapman@my-deja.com> wrote:

> I disagree with this advice, and the reason behind it. That's
> MUCH too broad. There is no runtime impact if you do not use
> the type for loops, arithmetic (succ/pred) or array subscripts.

Point taken - We may well add a warning to the Examiner for
those usages.
 - Rod


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/